Legal provisions involved:  Karnataka Civil Services Rules; Karnataka Civil Services (CC&A) Rules; Article 226 of the Constitution

Judgement by:  Karnataka High Court

Judge/Bench: Justice Anu Sivaraman and Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil

Facts

Employees working with the Karnataka Media Academy and the Karnataka State Temperance Board approached the court claiming pension under the Karnataka Civil Services Rules. A Single Judge had earlier allowed their claim and directed the Government to grant pension. The State challenged this decision before a Division Bench.

Key legal provisions

• Karnataka Civil Services Rules
• Karnataka Civil Services (CC&A) Rules
• Article 226 of the Constitution

Issues raised

• Whether employees of these two Boards can be treated as Government servants? 
• Whether applying KCSRs for pay and service conditions automatically makes their service pensionable?

Arguments of the case

The State argued that the Media Academy and Temperance Board are independent bodies and not Government departments. Their employees were covered under the Contributory Provident Fund and not pension. The employees argued that their posts were approved by the Government and that denying pension was unfair and unequal.

Judgement

The Court accepted all the appeals and the review petition and cancelled the Single Judge’s order that had granted pension to the employees. At the same time, the Court issued fresh directions to the State Government. It directed the Government to reconsider the employees’ request for pension, hear the Karnataka Media Academy and the Temperance Board, and then take a reasoned and informed decision on the issue within four months.

Click here to VIEW the full judgement.