Rajdhari And Another vs. Sadhna Devi (2025)

Allahabad High Court Holds That Only Spouses Can Seek Annulment of a Marriage, and In-Laws Have No Such Legal Right.
Allahabad High Court

Legal provisions involved: Sections 5(iii), 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Family Courts Act, 1984.

Judgement by: Allahabad High Court

Judge/Bench: Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice Satya Veer Singh

Facts

The parents of an army soldier who died in a terrorist encounter challenged a Family Court order which declared Sadhna Devi as their son’s legally wedded wife and widow. They claimed that no valid marriage had taken place and argued that the marriage was void because the woman was allegedly below 18 years of age at the time of marriage.

Key legal provisions

Sections 5(iii), 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Family Courts Act, 1984

Issues raised

Whether in-laws can ask the court to declare a marriage void on the ground that the bride was underage?

Arguments of the case

The parents argued that the marriage was invalid and that the Family Court had no authority to decide the issue. The woman stated that a proper marriage ceremony had taken place and was supported by documents and witness statements.

Judgement

The High Court held that only a spouse has the right to seek annulment of a marriage. Parents or in-laws cannot do so. Since the plea of underage marriage was never raised before the Family Court, it could not be raised for the first time in appeal. The appeal was dismissed, and the woman was confirmed as the legally wedded wife and widow.

Click here to VIEW the full judgement.