Legal provisions involved: Sections 74, 75(1) and 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
Judgement by: Kerala High Court
Judge/Bench: Justice Jobin Sebastian
Facts
A film director was arrested on 3 December 2025 after a woman aspiring to act in films accused him of sexual misconduct. She alleged that he called her to a film production office by promising her a role and then took her to a room under the excuse of discussing a script, where he allegedly molested her. He remained in judicial custody after his arrest.
Key legal provisions
- Sections 74, 75(1) and 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
- Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
Issues raised
Whether the accused should be given bail despite serious allegations, considering the time he had already spent in jail?
Arguments of the case
The accused asked for bail, stating that he had been in custody for some time and that the investigation could continue even if he was released. The prosecution opposed bail due to the seriousness of the offence.
Judgement
The High Court observed that the allegations were serious and showed a prima facie case of casting couch practices. However, since the accused had already spent time in custody and the investigation had progressed, the court granted bail with strict conditions to ensure his cooperation.
Click here to VIEW the full judgement.
