Legal Provisions Involved: Sections 413 and 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS); Sections 420, 415 read with 34 of the IPC; provisions of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958 and the Chit Funds Act, 1982.
Judgement by: Kerala High Court
Judge/Bench: Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas
Facts
In this case, the accused were acquitted by the trial court. The victim challenged this acquittal before the Sessions Court, but the appeal was dismissed. After this, the victim tried to file another appeal before the High Court by seeking special leave.
Key Legal Provisions
- Sections 413 and 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
- Sections 420, 415 read with 34 of the IPC
- Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958
- Chit Funds Act, 1982.
Issues Raised
Can a victim file a second appeal against an acquittal after the first appeal has already been decided?
Arguments of the Case
The victim argued that the law allows an appeal against every order of acquittal, including those confirmed by higher courts. Reliance was placed on Supreme Court judgments to say that the right to appeal arises as soon as the accused is acquitted.
Judgement
The High Court held that the law allows only one appeal by the victim against an acquittal. Once the victim has already appealed before the Sessions Court, a second appeal before the High Court is not allowed. The Court clarified that Section 413 speaks of “an appeal” and not multiple appeals.
Click here to VIEW the full judgement.
