M/S Premium Transmission Pvt. Limited vs. The State Of Maharashtra (2026)

Supreme Court: Interim Wages to Contract Workers Not Allowed Until Employer Status Is Proven.
Supreme Court of India

Legal provisions involved: Section 10 and 12 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

Judgement by: Supreme Court of India

Judge/Bench: Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

Facts

Workers hired through contractors claimed the contracts were fake and only used to deny them proper benefits. They raised an industrial dispute. The Management said the workers were not their employees and argued that no formal demand was made before going to conciliation. The Industrial Court ordered the company to give work and wages as interim relief, and the High Court agreed.

Key legal provisions

Section 10 and 12 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

Issues raised

Is it necessary to first give a written demand to the employer? Can a court order wages and work before deciding if workers are real employees?

Arguments of the case

Workers said they were actually working for the Management. The company said their status must be decided first.

Judgement

The Supreme Court said a written demand is not always needed. But giving interim wages and work before deciding worker status was wrong. The earlier orders were cancelled, and the lower court must first decide if the contracts are fake and who the real employer is.

Click here to VIEW the full judgement.